Tuesday, 21 Apr 2026

Current affairs publication that encourages citizens’ journalism

Explore Now
Townpress Newspaper
  • News
  • Africa
  • World
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • People
  • Motoring
  • Podcast
My News
  • ANC
  • Cyril Ramaphosa
  • eskom
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • SAPS
  • President Cyril Ramaphosa
  • Gauteng
  • DA
  • Nigeria
Townpress NewspaperTownpress Newspaper
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Africa
  • World
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • People
  • Motoring
  • Podcast
Search
  • News
  • Africa
  • World
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • People
  • Motoring
  • Podcast
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2014 - 2026 Townpress Newspaper, South Africa - Townpress logo & associated media rights are the intellectual property of Townpress Newspaper. All Rights Reserved.
General

Lawsuit accuses Google of illegally curbing employee communication

Town Press
Last updated: December 22, 2016 10:33 am
By
Town Press
December 22, 2016
Share
3 Min Read
A woman holds her smart phone, which displays the Google home page, in this picture illustration taken February 24, 2016. REUTERS/Eric Gaillard/Illustration/File Photo
SHARE

A Google Inc (GOOGL.O) product manager has sued the company, accusing it of unlawfully prohibiting employees from sharing concerns with coworkers, shareholders or the press, and maintaining a “spying program” to prevent leaks.

In the class action lawsuit filed on Tuesday in California state court in San Francisco, the employee, identified only as “John Doe,” says Google’s employment agreements are illegally broad and violate various state labor laws.

The plaintiff says the confidentiality agreements that all Google employees are required to sign essentially bar workers from saying anything about the company, even to each other. The agreements define confidential information as “without limitation, any information in any form that relates to Google or Google’s business that is not generally known,” according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says the agreements violate state laws that provide that employers cannot bar workers from discussing their wages or disclosing information to government agencies.

A spokesperson for Mountain View, California-based Google, a unit of Alphabet Inc, said in a statement that the claims were “baseless,” and said the agreements were designed to protect sensitive business information and not to bar employees from discussing working conditions.

“We’re very committed to an open internal culture, which means we frequently share with employees details of product launches and confidential business information,” the spokesperson said.

Ayanda Mabulu’s latest Zuma painting causes a stir
General Electric to cut 12,000 jobs in power business revamp
Government to appoint new board for Eskom
PEPSICO SETS GLOBAL TARGET FOR SUGAR REDUCTION

Google is facing similar claims from an unidentified employee in proceedings before the U.S. National Labor Relations Board, which recently struck down confidentiality agreements and other employment contracts that could discourage workers from discussing concerns at T-Mobile USA Inc, DirectTV and a number of other companies.

In the lawsuit, the plaintiff says that to enforce its policies, Google forces workers to spy on each other through a program called “Stopleaks” that requires them to report the disclosure of confidential information. Employees can be fired or sued for violating employment agreements or failing to report leaks, according to the lawsuit.

“Google continues to insist that Googlers refrain from plainly communicating with others that Google is violating the law or endangering consumers,” the complaint says.

- Advertisement -
Ad image

Plaintiffs in court cases are rarely allowed to proceed anonymously absent extraordinary circumstances. The Google worker says that being identified could harm his reputation at the company and his future job prospects.

The plaintiff is seeking to represent all current and former Google employees who signed the agreements. The lawsuit says the company has about 65,000 workers.

The case is Doe v. Google Inc, California Superior Court, San Francisco County, number not immediately available.

Facebook Comments

.
  • Bail Hearing Postponed For Mkhwanazi And Lerutla
  • Mbalula Outlines Major Intervention To Stabilise Municipal Services
  • Veteran Actress And Beauty Queen Cynthia Shange Dies At 76
  • Court Grants Matlala Request To Remain At Kgosi Mampuru Facility
Share This Article
Email Copy Link Print
ByTown Press
Follow:
At Town Press, we believe that everyone with a story deserves to be heard. We’re building a dynamic, citizen-led journalism platform that makes news publishing accessible to all South Africans, from rural townships to urban centers, and from first-time voices to seasoned storytellers.
Previous Article Facebook says government requests for account data rise 27 percent
Next Article South Africa’s justice departments under scrutiny in 2016
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

    FacebookLike
    XFollow
    YoutubeSubscribe
    MediumFollow
    RSS FeedFollow

    Top News

    Courts

    Bail Hearing Postponed For Mkhwanazi And Lerutla

    April 20, 2026
    General news

    Mbalula Outlines Major Intervention To Stabilise Municipal Services

    April 20, 2026
    Breaking

    Veteran Actress And Beauty Queen Cynthia Shange Dies At 76

    April 20, 2026
    Courts

    Court Grants Matlala Request To Remain At Kgosi Mampuru Facility

    April 20, 2026
    Top News
    Police appeal for help to find missing couple
    Community
    Illicit Alcohol Under Scrutiny as Compliance Checks Intensify
    Community
    Henke Pistorius Breaks Silence on Son’s Character and New Venture
    Right now
    Malema Returns To Court As Prosecutors Push For Maximum Sentence
    Courts
    Three Bodies, One Grave: Ncumisa Selani’s Secret Murders Shocked Pretoria
    Community
    Private School Shock: King David Victory Park Closure Resurfaces in 2026
    Community

    You May also Like

    General

    Google suspends some business with Huawei after Trump blacklist

    May 20, 2019
    General

    Republic of Congo to Host African Development Bank’s 2026 Annual Meetings

    September 22, 2025
    General

    Planned Power Outage To Affect Daveyton Residents On Tuesday

    March 20, 2026
    General

    Sabotage in Eskom electricity system cannot be ruled out: Gordhan

    December 6, 2018
    Show More
    • More News:
    • ANC
    • Cyril Ramaphosa
    • eskom
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • SAPS
    • President Cyril Ramaphosa
    • Gauteng
    • DA
    • Nigeria
    • Johannesburg
    • South Africa
    • zimbabwe
    • jacob zuma
    • EFF
    • Covid-19
    • KwaZulu-Natal
    • State capture
    • cape town
    • Hawks
    Townpress Newspaper

    Indigenous Newspaper created to embolden the township ideals of sharing information and connecting people to grassroots content locally and around the world. We believe communal stories are relevant, so we created the platform to tell the stories of real south africans, people you know.

    Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Youtube Medium Rss

    About Company

    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with US
    • Privacy Policy – T&C
    • Cookie Policy
    • Comments Policy
    • Submit a Tip
    Subscribe Now for Real-time Updates on the Latest Stories!
    © 2014 - 2026 Townpress Newspaper, South Africa - Townpress logo & associated media rights are the intellectual property of Townpress Newspaper. All Rights Reserved
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}
    Welcome to Townpress
    Username or Email Address
    Password

    Lost your password?