Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema says he will table a motion in the National Assembly calling for Speaker Thoko Didiza to step aside from her oversight role in Parliament’s impeachment proceedings against President Cyril Ramaphosa, arguing that her continued involvement presents a conflict of interest.
Malema contends that Didiza’s long-standing ties to the African National Congress, as well as decisions taken prior to her election as Speaker, make her unsuitable to preside over or influence the process. He is proposing that the role instead be delegated to her deputy, Annelie Lotriet.
The issue was raised during a meeting of the impeachment committee on Wednesday, where the majority of political parties reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with Didiza’s decision to abide by a court interdict brought by President Ramaphosa, which temporarily halted aspects of the committee’s work.
While the ANC maintains that the Speaker acted appropriately in her capacity as a neutral constitutional office bearer, several opposition parties argue that her position undermines Parliament’s authority and independence in holding the executive accountable.
Malema also questioned Didiza’s ability to appoint an impartial evidence leadership team for the impeachment inquiry, citing her earlier stance on the panel report that triggered the process. He argued that her previous voting record suggests she has already formed a view on the matter.
The impeachment committee has since supported a proposal by the EFF to appoint additional technical experts, including a forensic investigator and an exchange control specialist, to assist in examining allegations related to US dollar transactions said to have taken place at the president’s farm. Malema said such expertise is necessary to ensure the inquiry has access to credible and detailed evidence.
He added that a robust investigative team, similar in structure to high-profile commissions such as the Madlanga Commission, would strengthen the committee’s ability to interrogate complex financial allegations.
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has also criticised Didiza’s conduct, accusing her of favouring the governing party by not opposing the President’s legal bid. Meanwhile, the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP) has indicated that it is considering supporting Malema’s call for her recusal.
The matter continues to deepen political divisions within Parliament as the impeachment process unfolds, with opposition parties pushing for greater independence in the handling of the inquiry.
Facebook Comments