Wednesday, 4 November 2026 EC · FS · GP · KZN · L · MP · NW · NC · WC
National Notices Submit a story

Are you a Journalist or emerging writer, apply to Join Townpress Apply here

RiseFMListen live
Local Government Election 2026Waiting for the first results from the IECUpdates by itself as results come inView overall results →
  • Eastern CapeWaiting
  • Free StateWaiting
  • GautengWaiting
  • KwaZulu-NatalWaiting
  • MpumalangaWaiting
  • Northern CapeWaiting
  • LimpopoWaiting
  • North WestWaiting
  • Western CapeWaiting
View province results →
Community

Police find no case as Jacinta and Xolani arrest claims spread

Members of the March and March movement gathered in Durban on 30 June 2026, the date the group had previously set as its deadline for undocumented immigrants to leave South Africa. Protesters marched through parts of the city carrying placards, sticks and singing struggle songs as they called on government to intensify immigration enforcement, strengthen border security, and prioritise South African citizens in employment and business opportunities. The demonstration was monitored by law enforcement agencies, with a visible police presence to ensure public safety and manage traffic along the route. Organisers said the march marked the expiry of their self-imposed deadline and was intended to pressure authorities to take action against illegal immigration, while officials urged participants to remain peaceful and to respect the rights of all members of the public. Photo: SANDILE NDLOVU
SHARE

DURBAN — The National Prosecuting Authority has rejected claims that arrest warrants were issued for March and March leader Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma and her husband, Xolani Zuma, while police warned that unverified allegations could cause public panic.

Advertisement
trone ad

The denials follow public statements suggesting the couple faced imminent arrest linked to the movement’s activities. March and March also alleged political interference ahead of the 4 November municipal elections.

“The NPA wishes to categorically deny that any warrant of arrest was issued,” the authority said.

It rejected suggestions that politicians direct its decisions, saying prosecutions are determined independently through the Constitution, legislation and evidence.

KwaZulu-Natal police spokesperson Colonel Robert Netshiunda separately said police could trace no case registered against the couple. He urged activists to verify information before making public announcements and warned against statements that could incite violence.

The movement’s announcement had presented the anticipated arrests as an attempt to intimidate its leadership. However, Xolani’s own statement contained reservations about whether the information was accurate.

According to IOL, he said the movement was investigating the claims and that he did not believe they were true. He nevertheless offered to surrender to police if warrants were confirmed and called on supporters to remain calm.

That qualification is relevant to assessing the statements. Authorities have contradicted the warrant allegation, but the available reporting does not establish who supplied the information or whether those sharing it knew it was false.

The NPA urged individuals and organisations to avoid unfounded allegations that could misrepresent or undermine the criminal justice process.

It also said it generally does not discuss possible arrests or investigations before the relevant law enforcement processes are completed. Its denial of the reported warrants should therefore not be interpreted as a broader undertaking about any future legal proceedings.

The immediate issue is the publication of an unverified arrest warning, followed by explicit official denials. Any allegation of deliberate fabrication or an intention to provoke unrest would require further evidence.

Anyone with additional information can contact the press desk at press@townpress.co.za or drop a tip on our annonymous platform https://tips.townpress.co.za/